Wildfire risk in Mono County varies a lot by location. Across the places we scored, values run from 28.0 near Lee Vining to 76.9 in Walker, with a middle value of 52.5.
We scored 158 points across Mono County on the same 0–100 scale a Satelife address report uses, and they do not land in one place. 1% of them come out Very High, while 41% are Moderate. Which end your own parcel sits at is not something a county map can tell you.
FEMA NRI also rates Mono County: all-hazards risk Relatively Low · social vulnerability Relatively Low · community resilience Relatively High · annualised wildfire frequency 0.0040.
Sources: FEMA National Risk Index 1.20.0 (Dec 2025), county record · USFS Wildfire Risk to Communities v2.0, mean of the grid cells inside the county. Both describe the county as a whole, never an address in it.
What does your Mono County address score?
A county range shows the spread. Your parcel sits somewhere inside it — the report says where, and what to do about it.
Free to request · PDF report with a 0–100 score, the drivers behind it, and a mitigation plan
Most scored locations fall in the High tier. The count is 92 High, 64 Moderate, and 2 Very High, with no Low locations in the scored set.
County history also shows meaningful fire activity: 188,095 acres have burned since 1984, which is 9.4% of the county.
Since 1984, Mono County has had 121 recorded fire perimeters. In that period, 188,095 acres burned (9.4% of county area).
The largest fire named in the county fire record here is Cannon (2002) at 26,684 acres. The most recent large fire is Pack (2025).
Other major fires in or affecting the county include Slink (2020), listed at 26,752 acres and partly in the county, and Mountain View (2020) at 20,385 acres.

Fire perimeters coloured by decade. Select a perimeter for its name, year and size.
Perimeter sources: NIFC Interagency Fire Perimeter History · WFIGS Interagency Perimeters · largest on record: Cannon 2002. Perimeters are simplified for display; acreage is the figure the source records.
Mammoth Lakes is the largest community listed (population 8,234), and its middle wildfire-risk score is 55.1. Several smaller communities score somewhat higher, including Crowley Lake at 58.6 and Walker at 60.2.
June Lake (57.6), Benton (57.4), and Lee Vining (56.9) are in a similar range. Bridgeport is lower at 53.4.
Chalfant stands out on the lower end among listed communities at 44.0. So within one county, community-level wildfire risk can still differ noticeably.
The score is the median of the sampled points nearest that community — a community-scale indicator, not a score for any individual property in it. Population comes from the community's own record where the source carries one.
Terrain is a meaningful part of the county pattern. Terrain scores range from 30.0 in Crowley Lake to 65.0 in Chalfant, with a middle value of 55.0.
Vegetation and fuels are generally elevated in the scored locations. The middle score is 75.8, with the high end at 80.0 near Chalfant and a low of 5.0 in Lee Vining.
Hazard-zone scores also vary sharply by place, from 10.0 in Crowley Lake up to 90.0 in Walker. That contributes to why local wildfire risk can change quickly across the county.
Fire-weather scores were measured across the county and are fairly tight compared with other factors. They run from 54.9 in Lee Vining to 65.5 near Benton, with a middle value of 55.1.
A separate national model estimates mean annual burn probability at 0.41%, with a 90th-percentile cell value of 1.03%. This is a burn-probability measure, not a fire-weather score.
Risk is not uniform from one part of Mono County to another. The highest scored location is Walker at 76.9, while the lowest is near Lee Vining at 28.0.
That spread shows up in town-level patterns too. Walker has a community middle score of 60.2, while Chalfant is lower at 44.0.
Even where countywide ratings look moderate, local differences are large enough that nearby communities can sit in different risk tiers.
Each bar is what one part of the score covers across Mono County, on the same 0–100 scale. A long bar is a part of the risk that depends on where you are; a short one is the same almost everywhere.
The tick on each bar is the middle value. Tier boundaries — Moderate at 25, High at 50, Very High at 75 — are the faint lines behind them.
| Layer | Min | Median | Max | Lowest place | Highest place | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terrain | 30 | 55 | 65 | Crowley Lake | Chalfant | 158 |
| Vegetation & fuels | 5 | 75.8 | 80 | Lee Vining | near Chalfant | 158 |
| Hazard zone | 10 | 46.6 | 90 | Crowley Lake | Walker | 158 |
| Fire history | 5 | 20 | 95 | Crowley Lake | Mammoth Lakes | 158 |
| Fire weather | 54.9 | 55.1 | 65.5 | Lee Vining | near Benton | 158 |
| Composite | 28 | 52.5 | 76.9 | near Lee Vining | Walker | 158 |
Independently of Satelife's layers, the USFS Wildfire Risk to Communities grid puts the county's mean annual burn probability at 0.41% (90th percentile cell: 1.03%), with a mean conditional flame length of 6.35 ft. 97% of the 14,613 grid cells inside the county carry burnable fuel at all.
Source: USFS Wildfire Risk to Communities v2.0 (ImageServer, county extent).
CAL FIRE has no mapped Fire Hazard Severity Zone at 128 of the 158 sampled points — the zones cover Local Responsibility Areas, and most of this county is state or federal land. At 111 of them the USFS grid above supplied the hazard reading instead; at the remaining 17 the hazard weight is renormalised away rather than scored as low.
158 sample points on a ~2.3 km grid, plus one at the centre of each community, weighted with the Satelife county profile v1 · median layer coverage 100%. Scores are 0–100 and comparable within the county, not across states.
For countywide context, FEMA’s National Risk Index rates Mono County’s wildfire risk as Relatively Moderate and wildfire expected annual loss as Relatively Moderate. FEMA also rates the county’s all-hazards risk as Relatively Low.
At the same time, county-level ratings do not erase local variation. In the scored locations, there are 92 High points and 2 Very High points, so property-level and neighborhood-level differences matter in Mono County.
FEMA’s National Risk Index also rates social vulnerability as Relatively Low and community resilience as Relatively High. Those are countywide ratings, not ratings for a specific town or property.
Find out where your Mono County parcel sits
Slope, the fuel touching the structure, the road out, the fire history within a mile — measured at your address, not averaged across the county.
Free to request · PDF report with a 0–100 score, the drivers behind it, and a mitigation plan
Every one of the 16 ZIP areas that touch Mono County — we run address-level reports in all of them. They are grouped by the median score of the points we sampled inside each, which is a neighbourhood-scale indicator and not a score for any property: two homes in the same ZIP routinely land in different tiers.
High 6 ZIPs
Moderate 2 ZIPs
No sampled point inside 8 ZIPs
89410 Walker · 89444 Walker · 93634 · 95223 Walker · 95321 · 95364 · 95389 June Lake · 96133 Walker
Grouped from 8 of 16 ZIP areas — the rest had no sample point fall inside them. The community shown is the nearest mapped place to the ZIP's centre.
ZIP areas are Census 2020 ZIP Code Tabulation Areas intersecting the county boundary.
The most recent large fire listed for Mono County is Pack (2025).
Cannon (2002) is the largest named fire in the record here, at 26,684 acres.
No. The scored locations range from 28.0 near Lee Vining to 76.9 in Walker, so risk changes by location.
Yes. Fire-weather scores were measured in the county, ranging from 54.9 (Lee Vining) to 65.5 (near Benton).
188,095 acres have burned since 1984, equal to 9.4% of the county.
A county range shows the spread. An address-level Satelife report shows where in that spread your property actually sits — PDF, per-layer score, and a prioritized mitigation plan.
Start with your address →