Wildfire risk in Madera County spans a wide range from the valley floor to the Sierra foothills. In the places we scored, the lowest overall score was 17.6 in Madera, while the highest was 80.4 near Oakhurst.
We scored 156 points across Madera County on the same 0–100 scale a Satelife address report uses, and they do not land in one place. 4% of them come out Very High, while 26% are Low. Which end your own parcel sits at is not something a county map can tell you.
FEMA NRI also rates Madera County: all-hazards risk Relatively High · social vulnerability Relatively High · community resilience Very Low · annualised wildfire frequency 0.0069.
Sources: FEMA National Risk Index 1.20.0 (Dec 2025), county record · USFS Wildfire Risk to Communities v2.0, mean of the grid cells inside the county. Both describe the county as a whole, never an address in it.
What does your Madera County address score?
A county range shows the spread. Your parcel sits somewhere inside it — the report says where, and what to do about it.
Free to request · PDF report with a 0–100 score, the drivers behind it, and a mitigation plan
Most scored locations fall in the High tier. There are 76 High locations, and the county also includes Moderate, Low, and 7 Very High locations.
Looking back over recorded fire perimeters, 14.9% of the county has burned since 1984. FEMA’s National Risk Index rates Madera County’s wildfire risk as Relatively High.
The largest fire listed for the county is the Ferguson fire (2018), at 97,729 acres.
The most recent large fire is the River fire (2021), at 9,655 acres.
The Creek fire (2020) is also important here: it burned 379,802 acres and was partly in Madera County.
Since 1984, the county has had 149 mapped fire perimeters, and those perimeters together cover 14.9% of the county.


Fire perimeters coloured by decade. Select a perimeter for its name, year and size.
Perimeter sources: NIFC Interagency Fire Perimeter History · WFIGS Interagency Perimeters · largest on record: Ferguson 2018. Perimeters are simplified for display; acreage is the figure the source records.
For buyers and owners comparing towns, the biggest contrast is between the valley communities and the foothill communities. Madera and Chowchilla are lower in wildfire risk, while Oakhurst, North Fork, Bass Lake, and Coarsegold are notably higher.
That split lines up with where steeper terrain, heavier fuels, higher hazard-zone scores, and stronger fire-history scores appear in the county.
The score is the median of the sampled points nearest that community — a community-scale indicator, not a score for any individual property in it. Population comes from the community's own record where the source carries one.
Terrain is a major part of why risk changes across the county. Terrain scores run from 20.0 near Madera up to 65.0 near North Fork.
Vegetation and fuels show a similar split: 20.0 in Madera and 80.0 in North Fork. That pattern is associated with higher wildfire risk in the foothill and mountain communities.
State hazard-zone scores are much higher around Oakhurst (91.9) than near Madera (10.0).
Past fire footprint scores also separate these areas: near North Fork the score reaches 95.0, compared with 5.0 near Madera.
Fire-weather scores were measured across the county, and they are tightly grouped. They range from 54.3 near Bass Lake to 56.2 near Madera, so this factor is fairly similar from place to place.
A separate USFS wildfire model reports a mean annual burn probability of 0.61%, with a 90th-percentile cell value of 1.63%. It also indicates 89.1% of the county can burn.
Risk differs a lot by community. Madera (24.2) and Chowchilla (22.6) sit on the lower end of county scores, while Oakhurst is much higher at 72.8.
Other foothill communities are also elevated: North Fork is 67.8, Coarsegold is 62.9, and Bass Lake is 63.2.
At the countywide extremes, the highest scored location is near Oakhurst at 80.4, and the lowest is in Madera at 17.6.
Each bar is what one part of the score covers across Madera County, on the same 0–100 scale. A long bar is a part of the risk that depends on where you are; a short one is the same almost everywhere.
The tick on each bar is the middle value. Tier boundaries — Moderate at 25, High at 50, Very High at 75 — are the faint lines behind them.
| Layer | Min | Median | Max | Lowest place | Highest place | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terrain | 20 | 40 | 65 | near Madera | near North Fork | 156 |
| Vegetation & fuels | 20 | 61.7 | 80 | Madera | North Fork | 156 |
| Hazard zone | 10 | 47.5 | 91.9 | near Madera | Oakhurst | 156 |
| Fire history | 5 | 30 | 95 | near Madera | near North Fork | 156 |
| Fire weather | 54.3 | 56 | 56.2 | near Bass Lake | near Madera | 156 |
| Composite | 17.6 | 51.1 | 80.4 | Madera | near Oakhurst | 156 |
Independently of Satelife's layers, the USFS Wildfire Risk to Communities grid puts the county's mean annual burn probability at 0.61% (90th percentile cell: 1.63%), with a mean conditional flame length of 3.17 ft. 89% of the 14,655 grid cells inside the county carry burnable fuel at all.
Source: USFS Wildfire Risk to Communities v2.0 (ImageServer, county extent).
CAL FIRE has no mapped Fire Hazard Severity Zone at 57 of the 156 sampled points — the zones cover Local Responsibility Areas. At 55 of them the USFS grid above supplied the hazard reading instead; at the remaining 2 the hazard weight is renormalised away rather than scored as low.
156 sample points on a ~2.3 km grid, plus one at the centre of each community, weighted with the Satelife county profile v1 · median layer coverage 100%. Scores are 0–100 and comparable within the county, not across states.
At property scale, Madera County includes all four address-style risk tiers. The largest group of scored locations is High (76), and there are also Low (40) and Very High (7) locations, with Moderate locations in between.
For countywide context, FEMA’s National Risk Index rates Madera County as Relatively High for wildfire risk and Relatively High for expected annual loss from wildfire. FEMA also rates social vulnerability as Relatively High and community resilience as Very Low.
Find out where your Madera County parcel sits
Slope, the fuel touching the structure, the road out, the fire history within a mile — measured at your address, not averaged across the county.
Free to request · PDF report with a 0–100 score, the drivers behind it, and a mitigation plan
Every one of the 32 ZIP areas that touch Madera County — we run address-level reports in all of them. They are grouped by the median score of the points we sampled inside each, which is a neighbourhood-scale indicator and not a score for any property: two homes in the same ZIP routinely land in different tiers.
Very High 1 ZIP
High 9 ZIPs
Moderate 2 ZIPs
Low 4 ZIPs
No sampled point inside 16 ZIPs
93529 · 93546 · 93619 North Fork · 93620 Chowchilla · 93630 Madera · 93640 · 93664 North Fork · 93711 Madera · 93720 Madera · 93722 Madera · 93723 Madera · 93730 Madera · 95317 Chowchilla · 95333 Chowchilla · 95338 Oakhurst · 95389
Grouped from 16 of 32 ZIP areas — the rest had no sample point fall inside them. The community shown is the nearest mapped place to the ZIP's centre.
ZIP areas are Census 2020 ZIP Code Tabulation Areas intersecting the county boundary.
The most recent large fire is the River fire (2021), which burned 9,655 acres.
14.9% of the county has burned since 1984, based on mapped fire perimeters.
No. Scores are much lower in Madera and Chowchilla, and much higher in foothill communities like Oakhurst, North Fork, Bass Lake, and Coarsegold.
Fire-weather scores are very similar across the county (54.3 to 56.2). Bigger place-to-place differences show up in terrain, vegetation/fuels, hazard-zone scores, and fire history.
FEMA’s National Risk Index rates Madera County as Relatively High for wildfire risk, Relatively High for wildfire expected annual loss, and Very Low for community resilience.
A county range shows the spread. An address-level Satelife report shows where in that spread your property actually sits — PDF, per-layer score, and a prioritized mitigation plan.
Start with your address →