Wildfire risk in Cochise County spans a wide range across the places we scored. The lowest overall score is 26.2 in Douglas, while the highest is 84.3 in Sierra Vista Estates. The middle point is 55.2, so many locations sit in a moderate-to-high band rather than at either extreme.
We scored 166 points across Cochise County on the same 0–100 scale a Satelife address report uses, and they do not land in one place. 4% of them come out Very High, while 20% are Moderate. Which end your own parcel sits at is not something a county map can tell you.
FEMA NRI also rates Cochise County: all-hazards risk Relatively Moderate · social vulnerability Relatively High · community resilience Very Low · annualised wildfire frequency 0.0089.
Sources: FEMA National Risk Index 1.20.0 (Dec 2025), county record · USFS Wildfire Risk to Communities v2.0, mean of the grid cells inside the county. Both describe the county as a whole, never an address in it.
What does your Cochise County address score?
A county range shows the spread. Your parcel sits somewhere inside it — the report says where, and what to do about it.
Free to request · PDF report with a 0–100 score, the drivers behind it, and a mitigation plan
Most scored locations fall in the High tier, with 125 points there. Moderate has 34 points, and Very High has 7 points. None of the scored points fell in the Low tier.
For county-wide context, FEMA’s National Risk Index rates Cochise County’s wildfire risk as "Relatively High" and its wildfire expected annual loss as "Relatively High." In the USFS Wildfire Risk to Communities product, mean annual burn probability is 1.05%, with 1.95% at the 90th-percentile cell.
Since 1984, 742,352 acres have burned in Cochise County, and that equals 18.7% of the county. The county record also shows 273 fire perimeters over that period.
The largest fire listed is Horseshoe 2 (2011), at 222,990 acres. Another major fire in the county record is Monument (2011), at 32,074 acres.
The most recent large fire entry is listed as Unknown (9999).


Fire perimeters coloured by decade. Select a perimeter for its name, year and size.
Perimeter sources: NIFC Interagency Fire Perimeter History · WFIGS Interagency Perimeters · largest on record: Horseshoe 2 2011. Perimeters are simplified for display; acreage is the figure the source records.
Among named communities, the higher overall scores include Miracle Valley at 77.4, Huachuca City at 74.8, and Nicksville at 73.6.
On the lower end, Douglas is 38.9 and San Simon is 41.8, while Sierra Vista is closer to the county middle at 56.5. That spread shows why two towns in the same county can still face different wildfire risk conditions.
The score is the median of the sampled points nearest that community — a community-scale indicator, not a score for any individual property in it. Population comes from the community's own record where the source carries one.
Fire weather was not measured at all in the county results shown here.
What was measured does show terrain differences: terrain scores run from 55.0 near Nicksville to 65.0 at Naco, with the middle value at 65.0.
Vegetation and fuels vary more. Scores go from 20.0 in Douglas to 80.0 near Douglas, and the middle value is 73.1. In practical terms, fuels are one of the stronger contributors to why nearby places can have different wildfire risk.
Fire weather was not measured at the sampled points in Cochise County. The other four indicators on this page were, and the bars below show what they found.
Risk is not uniform across Cochise County. In the places scored, Douglas is at the low end with 26.2, while Sierra Vista Estates is at the high end with 84.3.
Hazard-zone scores also vary sharply by location, from 10.0 near Nicksville to 95.4 in Sierra Vista Estates. The middle hazard-zone value is 49.6.
Fire-history scores show a similar spread: 5.0 in Naco and 95.0 near Nicksville, with a middle value of 30.0.
Each bar is what one part of the score covers across Cochise County, on the same 0–100 scale. A long bar is a part of the risk that depends on where you are; a short one is the same almost everywhere.
The tick on each bar is the middle value. Tier boundaries — Moderate at 25, High at 50, Very High at 75 — are the faint lines behind them.
| Layer | Min | Median | Max | Lowest place | Highest place | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terrain | 55 | 65 | 65 | near Nicksville | Naco | 166 |
| Vegetation & fuels | 20 | 73.1 | 80 | Douglas | near Douglas | 166 |
| Hazard zone | 10 | 49.6 | 95.4 | near Nicksville | Sierra Vista Estates | 166 |
| Fire history | 5 | 30 | 95 | Naco | near Nicksville | 166 |
| Composite | 26.2 | 55.2 | 84.3 | Douglas | Sierra Vista Estates | 166 |
Independently of Satelife's layers, the USFS Wildfire Risk to Communities grid puts the county's mean annual burn probability at 1.05% (90th percentile cell: 1.95%), with a mean conditional flame length of 4.76 ft. 88% of the 39,806 grid cells inside the county carry burnable fuel at all.
Source: USFS Wildfire Risk to Communities v2.0 (ImageServer, county extent).
CAL FIRE has no mapped Fire Hazard Severity Zone at 166 of the 166 sampled points — the zones cover Local Responsibility Areas, and most of this county is state or federal land. At 141 of them the USFS grid above supplied the hazard reading instead; at the remaining 25 the hazard weight is renormalised away rather than scored as low.
166 sample points on a ~2.3 km grid, plus one at the centre of each community, weighted with the Satelife county profile v1 · median layer coverage 90%. Scores are 0–100 and comparable within the county, not across states.
For property-level context, the USFS Wildfire Risk to Communities product indicates 87.9% of Cochise County can burn. It reports a mean annual burn probability of 1.05% and a mean conditional flame length of 4.76 feet.
County-wide community conditions in FEMA’s National Risk Index are also relevant when comparing properties: social vulnerability is rated "Relatively High" and community resilience is rated "Very Low." FEMA’s all-hazards county rating is "Relatively Moderate."
Find out where your Cochise County parcel sits
Slope, the fuel touching the structure, the road out, the fire history within a mile — measured at your address, not averaged across the county.
Free to request · PDF report with a 0–100 score, the drivers behind it, and a mitigation plan
Every one of the 29 ZIP areas that touch Cochise County — we run address-level reports in all of them. They are grouped by the median score of the points we sampled inside each, which is a neighbourhood-scale indicator and not a score for any property: two homes in the same ZIP routinely land in different tiers.
High 18 ZIPs
Moderate 2 ZIPs
No sampled point inside 9 ZIPs
85534 · 85546 · 85608 Pirtleville · 85611 Whetstone · 85624 Huachuca City · 85627 Benson · 88020 · 88045 · 88056
Grouped from 20 of 29 ZIP areas — the rest had no sample point fall inside them. The community shown is the nearest mapped place to the ZIP's centre.
ZIP areas are Census 2020 ZIP Code Tabulation Areas intersecting the county boundary.
In the places scored here, no points fell in the Low tier. Most points are in High, with smaller counts in Moderate and Very High.
The largest listed fire is Horseshoe 2 (2011) at 222,990 acres. The most recent large fire entry is shown as Unknown (9999).
No. Fire weather was not measured at all in the county results shown here.
No. FEMA’s National Risk Index ratings are county-wide ratings. For Cochise County, FEMA rates wildfire risk as "Relatively High."
A county range shows the spread. An address-level Satelife report shows where in that spread your property actually sits — PDF, per-layer score, and a prioritized mitigation plan.
Start with your address →