{
  "title": "Wildfire Risk in ZIP 95204 (Stockton), CA | Satelife",
  "description": "ZIP 95204 in Stockton, San Joaquin County, CA: the points we sampled inside it score a median 13.4 out of 100 (Low), against 10.8–70.9 across San Joaquin County. Wildfire risk is measured per parcel, not per ZIP.",
  "image": "https://satelife.ai/images/img_01.jpg",
  "canonical": "https://satelife.ai/wildfire-risk/zip/95204/",
  "content": "[Home](/)›[Wildfire Risk](/wildfire-risk/)›[California](/wildfire-risk/california/)›[San Joaquin County](/wildfire-risk/california/san-joaquin-county/)›ZIP 95204\n\nZIP 95204 · Stockton, San Joaquin County, CA\n\n# Wildfire risk in _ZIP 95204_, Stockton\n\nThe points we sampled inside this ZIP score a median of **13.4** out of 100 — **Low**, below the San Joaquin County middle of 18.9. That is a neighbourhood-scale reading, not a score for any address in it.\n\n[Score my 95204 address →](#score-my-address) [Open the San Joaquin County page ↓](/wildfire-risk/california/san-joaquin-county/)\n\nAt a glance\n\n## What we measured in _95204_\n\n13.4 median of the 3 sampled points inside this ZIP · Low\n\n10.8–70.9 the range across San Joaquin County, from 178 points\n\n4% of the way up the county's measured range\n\nStockton nearest mapped community to this ZIP's centre\n\nThe four tiers on this page are the ones a Satelife address report prints — Low below 25, Moderate to 50, High to 75, Very High above it. A ZIP is a postal area, so the number above is the middle of what we measured inside it. Either way, two houses in this ZIP can sit in different tiers, and the only way to know which is to score the parcel.\n\nWhat does your 95204 address score?\n\nThe ZIP number above is a neighbourhood median. Slope, the fuel touching the structure, the road out and the fire history within a mile are measured at the address itself.\n\nFree to request · PDF report with a 0–100 score, the drivers behind it, and a mitigation plan\n\nFire record\n\n## The fires _nearest to here_\n\nDistances are from the centre of ZIP 95204 to the centre of each fire's mapped perimeter, so a large fire's edge may have come far closer than the number suggests. The full record for the county — every named fire, the acreage and the share of the county burned — is on the [San Joaquin County page](/wildfire-risk/california/san-joaquin-county/).\n\nSan Joaquin Co. Fire 1953 · 2,760 acres · San Joaquin County 23_km away_\n\nExplosives Fire 2009 · 1,989 acres · San Joaquin County 37_km away_\n\nMidway Fire 2006 · 5,540 acres · San Joaquin County 38_km away_\n\nSite 300 #3 Fire 1984 · 7,605 acres · San Joaquin County 39_km away_\n\nTesla Fire 2005 · 6,440 acres · San Joaquin County 41_km away_\n\nWhere to go next\n\n## ZIP 95204 _in context_\n\n[Wildfire risk in San Joaquin County The full county page: fire record, what drives the score, communities](/wildfire-risk/california/san-joaquin-county/) [California wildfire risk Every county we publish in the state](/wildfire-risk/california/) [How Satelife calculates wildfire risk Data sources, layers, score composition, honest limits](/wildfire-risk/methodology/) [Run a report for a 95204 address PDF + score + mitigation plan](/#cta)\n\nThis page is built from the San Joaquin County data pack: risk samples on a grid across the county, of which 3 fell inside ZIP 95204. Scores are informational decision support — not a substitute for official evacuation orders, a fire-agency hazard determination, or an insurer's underwriting judgement, and never a measurement of any individual property.\n\n## What does _your parcel_ look like, layer by layer?\n\nA ZIP median is the middle of a neighbourhood. An address-level Satelife report shows where in that spread your property actually sits — PDF, per-layer score, and a prioritized mitigation plan.\n\n[Start with your address →](/#cta)\n\n[![PRR](/images/prr.png)](/ficha-de-website-voucher-satelife.pdf)\n\n© 2024–2026 Satelife, Lda. All rights reserved.\n\nSatelife reports are for informational purposes only and do not constitute insurance, financial, or legal advice."
}